Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Except building something the second time around is often quicker and with the current gains of hardware capabilities and interest in the space… maybe it wouldn’t be a year behind.


There are also a ton of ~first mover advantages you can't benefit from, be they of untapped markets for demand or the exploitation of underpriced labor, capital, or IP. If Sam started a new company he would not get as good a deal on hardware or labor, he would get much more scrutiny on his training sets, and he would have to compete against both OpenAI and its competitors.


For sure. Getting ahead and staying ahead is one of them.

I’m just not sure it would be totally starting from scratch since there is more of a playbook and know how.


I agree. Anthropic and Mistral are good examples. Both companies have key people from OpenAI and they fairly quickly developed good models, but I don’t think either are thinking too hard about real AGI, but instead are trying to create useful and ethical tools.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: