It's sexist to refer to her solely based on her relationship with someone else when we're talking about her in the context of her expertise. The fact that she's JGL's wife has nothing to do with her merit, and so it comes off as dismissive, especially when the point being made is about her lack of ability.

Why can't you just criticize her "joke of a resume" directly instead of bringing up her spouse?

Generalizations and statements like this reflect bias in subtle ways that minimize women, and I'm glad it's being called out in some capacity.

I don't know that it would be a resume that would inspire confidence in a for-profit business's board that is primarily concerned with shareholder value.

I also don't know that it is a particularly problematic resume for someone sitting on the board of a non-profit that is expressly not about that. Someone that is too much of a business insider is far less likely to be going to bat for a charter that is explicitly in tension with following the best commercial path.