> I wouldn't be surprised if numbers and physics go hand in hand, in the sense that we can only observe these, and not the more irregular patterns that make up the total chaos that we might exist in.
I am curious to see how far we can get with the logic and mathematics that we understand (as humans). Perhaps there is a perfectly "logical", consistent and complete description of why the universe exists and what it looks like that is beyond our comprehension. Maybe we wouldn't even recognize the description as such if it were shown to us (comparable to an abstract painting with two lines and one dot that is supposed to depict a woman).
This kind of reasoning is slightly problematic. What does it mean if properties of "logic" are "logical"? Does that lead to tautology, recursion, symmetry, or worse?
I notice that you put "logical" in quotes, so you seem to be aware of this problem. Any idea how to get around it?
I am curious to see how far we can get with the logic and mathematics that we understand (as humans). Perhaps there is a perfectly "logical", consistent and complete description of why the universe exists and what it looks like that is beyond our comprehension. Maybe we wouldn't even recognize the description as such if it were shown to us (comparable to an abstract painting with two lines and one dot that is supposed to depict a woman).