Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I mean if you're not watching the ads, you're only costing them money. I'm not going to call it "theft" or anything but don't be surprised that you're unwelcome.


What if you're watching ads, but not clicking on any of them? Are you costing them money or not?

What if you click on ads, but don't ever anything? Costing or not?


It’s not a tricky question. Advertisers have long decided they like those odds. That’s why advertising deals aren’t limited to CPA.


Gamblers have decided they like their odds. Gambling costs them money, and some ruin themselves that way.

If I don't click on ads and don't buy anything, it's like I'm rigging the slot machine never to pay out.

If everyone does that, then advertisers will catch on to the reality that the ads are not working, and pull out, and so then the advertising platform tanks.

So yes, you are "stealing" by not clicking on ads, and not obeying the ads just as much as if you just block the ads.

People who don't block ads, but take no consumer action in response to ads, are not in any ethically different position compared to those who actively block ads higher up the event chain.

Possibly in a worse one, since those ineffective ads are a waste of resources. It's like leaving the heating on in an empty house.


I think you a word


Not necessarily true. People who share videos on social media drive traffic to YT, effectively giving them free advertising..much as many users are giving them free content.


With all the link tracking, I bet they have a good idea of which accounts are good for sharing videos and which aren't.


They steal your data, though, and get to create behavioral profiles without paying users a cent.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: