> we're one thought away for being thrown into jail for shower thoughts that go slightly the wrong side of "publicly acceptable".
Not really. That’s like being laughed at for being naked at a nudist camp. If nobody has privacy, all of those little thoughts become public and the perception of what’s acceptable shifts
In a weird way privacy is a double edged sword and necessitates its own existence
I think, in general, we’d be a lot more sane as a society if we held back less from one another
except what we're talking about here is corporate bodies with algorhythms automating prejudice, and leveraging risk... a very different thing to sharing with one another isnt it?
>Not really. That’s like being laughed at for being naked at a nudist camp. If nobody has privacy, all of those little thoughts become public and the perception of what’s acceptable shifts
No, it just means that anyone can be destroyed if they offend the keeper of the data.
Not really. That’s like being laughed at for being naked at a nudist camp. If nobody has privacy, all of those little thoughts become public and the perception of what’s acceptable shifts
In a weird way privacy is a double edged sword and necessitates its own existence
I think, in general, we’d be a lot more sane as a society if we held back less from one another