>Even ignoring that this is a very old article, what sort of feedback do you expect people to give?
Something higher quality than the most common bike shedding comment in history. Names are important but not tue end all be all.
It's also useless feedback becsuse as you said: it's a very old article and the author already acknowledged 7 years ago that the name and genre it got assumedly stuck into didn't help. It's not only not useful feedback, it shows people did not read the article.
Something higher quality than the most common bike shedding comment in history. Names are important but not tue end all be all.
It's also useless feedback becsuse as you said: it's a very old article and the author already acknowledged 7 years ago that the name and genre it got assumedly stuck into didn't help. It's not only not useful feedback, it shows people did not read the article.