> I think the cards should just be what the post is, not a description of it.
This would make the blue look-into-it-more button useless
> the creators value judgments are inserted (for instance “ethnic slur” is ambiguous in many real cases, eg negro could be legit in a spanish-speaking or referencing context, or “white trash” which could both be a slur and the title of an edgy Vice documentary).
You’re supposed to use the blue look-into-it-more button to figure this kind of stuff out
> You’re supposed to use the blue look-into-it-more button
Isn't that the problem? If a report is in regards to the content of a post, and we have limited time, why not start with the actual content being reported first and have the reporter's arbitrary comments be secondary?
That button was just weird and added extra time, while speed was a goal. Also I don’t think that button always had raw user content, it was also sometimes just a description, just with more details like a hint. Iirc
yes. the point of the button is to add extra time. the point of the button is to decide if you want to make a decision based on the limited context you have directly in front of you or do you want to spend some time getting more context to make a better decision. which is absolutely a thing in real moderation
This would make the blue look-into-it-more button useless
> the creators value judgments are inserted (for instance “ethnic slur” is ambiguous in many real cases, eg negro could be legit in a spanish-speaking or referencing context, or “white trash” which could both be a slur and the title of an edgy Vice documentary).
You’re supposed to use the blue look-into-it-more button to figure this kind of stuff out