Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No it wasn't conservative. It was very risky completely based on assuming almost 0% interest rates over 10 years and fully locked in. That's clearly a crazy position to take. Every small increase in interest rates has a outsized effect on these bonds.


It's not that crazy considering we saw 10 years of 0% interest rates... well for the past 10 years. If anything it was the status quo. Only in hindsight does it look crazy.


That the interest rates were at 0% for so long implies that the rates will have to be going up in the near future. They can't stay at 0 forever, and 10 years is a very long time.

The obviously risky bet is that the rates would stay 0.


That's just gambler's fallacy. If you said the same thing in 2018 you'd have just as much evidence, but you would have been wrong.


How would I have been wrong? They didn't stay at zero forever.


In 2018 some countries had started experimenting with negative interest rates, so 0 isn’t the lower bound. Secondly, you would have been wrong for the next ~3 years. That’s a long time to be on the wrong side of a bet. Long term nothing is guaranteed of course.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: