Is this due to C++ name mangling? I just had a flashback to the early 90s when I ran into that problem with Watcom C++ and Windows symbol loading, we had to resort to rewriting the exports and imports to shorter names just to be able to debug. Bad memories!
Templated code can lead to some really long symbol names. As a random tangent, I was trying to figure out why Chrome's stack symbolizer wasn't working for some stack frames this week… and came across this comment in the symbolizer.
char demangled[256]; // Big enough for sane demangled symbols.
Turns out the longest symbol name in the Chrome binary is 32k characters long... and some of the tests have even longer ones (the longest one I found was 98k characters).
Crikey. We (C++Builder) were looking at some Boost debugging issues a couple of years ago and realised some symbols were a couple of thousand characters long. I thought _that_ was bad!
