> I wouldn't consider this "static HTML" why not? this could be served on a serv... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

chii on Feb 19, 2023 | parent | context | favorite | on: Password protect a static HTML page

> I wouldn't consider this "static HTML"

why not? this could be served on a server which does not have any dynamic execution capabilities, and does not require the server to handle any other request other than just the HTML.

userbinator on Feb 19, 2023 [–]

In my experience, that's normally called "static hosting", not "static HTML".

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact