Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is so unfortunate though. It really means that repetition/reimplementation (without reuse) is really the only guaranteed way of dealing with supply chain security. Other techniques like sandboxing could be useful, but are not a panacea in this case.


I think it's just like the physical supply chain. Everyone will pick some point on the continuum between vulnerability and reimplementation based on their individual needs.

But I think it should be clear that "well we had a black box AI make them" is not going to be a satisfying answer for militaries trying to remove hostile powers from their electronics supply chains. No different with software.


Yeah - I think there needs to be substantially more effort on AI safety/comprehensibility, before we progress much further. But knowing history, it seems likely we’ll sooner reach a point where blind use of AI will result in significant financial and/or human losses, and only then we’ll start applying real care in its application.


Yeah this is basically my perspective as well. I think the long future of this could be pretty great, but I think the period between now and that future may be pretty choppy.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: