Disagree -- the existing disclaimers are, IMO, more sufficient than any ToS one sees on typical digital services or digital-derived products.
If the Engineering Board (EB) wants to require formal stamps for their engineer's outputs, they should define that. They don't have the authority to regulate lumber, meat, the thickness of paper, or other markets. This market is separate from their standard market for engineering marks -- this is the market for approximate views from derived data with no legal standing for Engineering work. The EB wants to make that an established guild only. No consideration is needed IMO.
If the Engineering Board (EB) wants to require formal stamps for their engineer's outputs, they should define that. They don't have the authority to regulate lumber, meat, the thickness of paper, or other markets. This market is separate from their standard market for engineering marks -- this is the market for approximate views from derived data with no legal standing for Engineering work. The EB wants to make that an established guild only. No consideration is needed IMO.