The fact is that full-time permanent jobs declined by 77k. The bulk of new job creation was in part-time, transient positions that for the most part don't pay enough to sustain people - especially with inflation rampant. The numbers look good, as long as you don't look too closely into the numbers - my point stands.
Don't you find it curious that the article fails to mention these details? I do.
The source being a tweet from clear right wing nutcase. Not gonna waste my time looking through his tweets to learn that he thinks there are "election fraud" in AZ.
I'm not a labor economist and know nothing about job reports. A quick read into the technical notes mentions that there are two separate surveys and the 528k number comes from the second establishment numbers (https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.b.htm).
apparently the lesson the french researcher tweeting chorizo and calling it a star to raise awareness of appeal to experts is pretty well needed. Like in this thread, a random person on twitter with numbers and a likely bias is cited presumably just because the tweet happens to what the poster here wants to be true, not because the numbers are well explained.
Household Survey Full Time -71,000 Part Time +384,000 Multiple Jobs +92,000
source: https://twitter.com/RobertLutherFL/status/155555070208416973...