Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Unless I am missing something, that's how you would expect it to be. The failure rate is very high for venture capital and returns concentrated in a handful of outsized winners, so you would expect from, a large sample size, for investments to be predictably poor no matter what public information or indicator you use, such as eye color, hair color, sector, whatever. EMH only applies to public markets, not early stage private ones anyway. I am skeptical of anything published on SSRN, zero peer review to publish there.


SSRN is a pre-print repository, so that’s a strange criticism: it’s exactly what it says it is.

And this article isn’t really about EMH, it’s about the quality of capital allocation decisions based on the information that was available when the decisions were made.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: