Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Y'know, I went looking for something to debunk this (rather implausible sounding) theory, so I googled "rothschild snopes". Snopes doesn't actually have anything, but I did find this rather delicious thread from the prisonplanet forums, wherein a bunch of conspiracy nuts speculate about precisely who is funding snopes:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=196892.0

Snopes most definitely is a disinfo website much like wikipedia

Anyway, I certainly can't find any evidence to support the contention that the Rothschilds are significantly wealthier than the wealthiest known people, and I don't believe it's possible to have a trillion dollars in assets while flying underneath the radar.



Why is it implausible that money doesn't just vanish over time?

I have no idea how much money they have but I don't see why it would have declined. They have always been shrewd investors.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: