Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Most of the smart contract system has been based on the assumption that contract termination/violation is not possible. This effectively ignores counter party risk.

I mean, maintaining the peg is based on that assumption, but I doubt "price of luna going to zero" is a scenario that serious analysts skipped over. Therefore, the failure to account for that scenario is still on them.



fair, but then what is the smart contract really doing?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: