Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not saying the 'legal' books shouldn't be part of the bible because they have 'no theological value'.

I'm saying that when a hollywood actor in a film makes fun of christians and says something like "oh go sacrifice a goat like it says in your bible", they are willfully misrepresenting those verses as "cherry-picking your beliefs and conveniently leaving out the goat stuff", when in fact typically they're quoting verses of legal/historical significance, rather than of a dogmatic/theological nature.



> typically they're quoting verses of legal/historical significance, rather than of a dogmatic/theological nature

This distinction dos not make sense. The laws in the Bible is literally given by God.


Hold on a minute - You lost me here - how can description of animal sacriface on na altar not have theological nature?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: