It’s important to keep pointing these things out. I’m not quite as pessimistic as some who believe that the US will continue to do these things forever; I believe the US populace is slowly waking up to what has been done in their names. While people may quibble with the motivations and morality of individual incidents that you’ve mentioned, overall I haven’t heard convincing arguments that they’ve made the world safer overall. The Yugoslavia situation, for example, was pretty complex and I could debate the differences with Ukraine all day, without disagreeing with your overall point.
But I also feel that it’s important to acknowledge that if it was wrong for the US, it is wrong for Russia. There are too many people out there who aren’t really being sincere with their arguments and are using US crimes to justify Russian ones.
A problem is that the US often intervened when things were in free fall like in Libya, Yugoslawia or were already horrible like in Afghanistan, Somalia. But by their intervention they are now responsible for everything that happened afterwards. Its like comparing the patient mortality rate of dermatologists with those of emergency doctors. Can you really compare Zelensky to Saddam Hussein, Assad or the Taliban?
For example counterfactually i am pretty sure that Ruanda would have fared better with an intervention.
But I also feel that it’s important to acknowledge that if it was wrong for the US, it is wrong for Russia. There are too many people out there who aren’t really being sincere with their arguments and are using US crimes to justify Russian ones.