Given that the vast majority of mainstream article posts are from a place of opposite bias, I think it's a breath of fresh air to have a different bias at the forefront every once in a while.

This is a false equivalence. The opinion of someone who does not believe in science is not magically equal to those of people who do and are well versed in it when it comes to debating scientific matters.

Your post is a false equivalence, you can believe in science while not parroting a particular establishment/authoritarian narrative of science (which also includes misinformation/ignoring other science) to further a particular narrative with a particular bias.