Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is one of those "technically correct" statements that is mostly useless.

Yes, some people do want to run their own servers. The vast majority -- more than 99%, by the article's own admission -- do not. To me, "people don't want to run their own servers, and never will" is completely accurate.

I am a "nerd" by Moxie's definition, and I mostly do not want to run my own servers. I have a VPS[0] that I use as a playground, and to run some useful but non-critical things, but it doesn't run anything remotely critical, and if it went down for hours or days, it wouldn't be a big deal.

The idea of running my own infra that's critical or at least important to my participation in digital matters does not interest me at all. For a "web0" example, I absolutely would not want to run my own email server. (I did this when I was much younger, and regretted doing so.)

I also disagree that the small, sub-1% faction that will run servers is enough for this web3 decentralization-for-the-masses world. Ultimately someone else is controlling your traffic and your content, and there are a limited number of others you can switch to if you don't like the current steward you've chosen.

[0] And also consider that having a VPS is only partially running my own server. I'm running the OS and applications on it (or, rather, on a VM running on that server), but someone else makes sure the server hardware and network are functioning, and is on the hook to fix them if they aren't.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: