> If a child answers a phone, and someone on the other end tells them to harm themselves, the phone wouldn't be considered the risk.
If I, a billion dollar company, advertise a service where people can phone me and ask questions, and some bored kid phones up and I tell them to stick a fork in a power socket, then I would be considered the risk.
Your biased is clear, that you think the value of the company has anything to do with the liabilit. Would you blame a search engine if the results of a query returned results. Siri, on the iphone can give very similar result, I don't see the revolt and people blaming Apple.
Where does amazon say that they are going to filter the results, to make sure you don't have to use critical thinking to evaluate if your query result will harm you?
I just don't see the logic, and this is seemingly is largely driven by the current hate stream pushed towards amazon.
Uh, yes. Yes I would blame a search engine if its results predictably said <go do horrible thing> and likewise I don't recall any instance of Siri telling bored patrons to stick forks in electrical sockets.
If I, a billion dollar company, advertise a service where people can phone me and ask questions, and some bored kid phones up and I tell them to stick a fork in a power socket, then I would be considered the risk.