Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> What’s wrong with OSX on M1?

It’s not open-source and it’s not Linux.



Their kernel at least is and it’s Unix. From a user standpoint I don’t have any issues with it, it’s like if Linux could run photoshop natively and had good paid software and you can’t change the UI. It’s not ideal but it works for me.


But the rest of the system is not. I want I computer that I can use in the way that I want, with the software that I want, and not a computer that must be used as Apple wants, and limits you in using an hardware that you bought.

The reason why I use Linux is that I can do whatever I want on my computer, I don't have to have signed applications, annoying prompts to tell me that the software is not Apple approved (till there are the prompts and Apple doesn't decide to forbid all unsigned software as on iOS), and similar.

Also from an hardware standpoint Mac are overpriced machines, with insufficient I/O that forces you to bring a bag of adapters with yourself and components that are all soldered on the motherboard, impossible to upgrade.


> But the rest of the system is not. I want I computer that I can use in the way that I want, with the software that I want, and not a computer that must be used as Apple wants, and limits you in using an hardware that you bought.

You can't run a lot of software on linux, you can run less of it compared to windows and osx. All hardware is limited, all the x86 laptops have soldered CPUs, there is no such thing as unlimited hardware.

>Also from an hardware standpoint Mac are overpriced machines, with insufficient I/O that forces you to bring a bag of adapters with yourself and components that are all soldered on the motherboard, impossible to upgrade.

M1 is not overpriced for its benefits, the x86 stuff I agree with though and fuck their keyboards. No more Jony Ive, so ports are back!

>The reason why I use Linux is that I can do whatever I want on my computer, I don't have to have signed applications, annoying prompts to tell me that the software is not Apple approved (till there are the prompts and Apple doesn't decide to forbid all unsigned software as on iOS), and similar.

The problem I have with this is that its not that you can do whatever, you MUST do it and use a lot of time in configuration. I find the root prompt just as annoying in linux. I just want a working environment, not a bunch of software that asks me to set every preference.


> Their kernel at least is

It does not solve main problems of the proprietary software: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-even-more-impor....


I don't see the problem, I want to run better software I have to pay for, not crappy free stuff, and giving choice to do that is not a negative. If linux did not allow any paid software, it would not make it a better OS.


> better software I have to pay for, not crappy free stuff

Free software is not about price, it's about freedom. It can (and should!) be paid for.


I have tried to replace photoshop with free software forever, and nothing still comes close to CS2. I don't care to make my life harder or use crappier tools because its not free. There is nothing free about crippling a workflow.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: