Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There is no evidence of animal host transmission either. Does it make it literally a conspiracy theory too?


Do you believe animals literally conspired to transmit to humans?

I believe what you're describing is rather "the coordinated malevolent animal transmission theory".


What does it even supposed to mean? The lab theory is not that humans conspired to spread the virus, but it happened due to negligence. What's happening then is a cover-up, not a conspiracy.

Cover-up is the default mode of handling failure in an aspiring Communist state. When a major accident happens that can be covered up, it will be covered up.

The above mentioned Sverdlovsk outbreak was presented as natural as well: the official culprit was cough a wet market nearby cough. Took 13 years and the dissolution of USSR to admit the cover-up.


I mean... if you think the animals actually maliciously conspired I suppose


Do you really suppose the lab theory is Wuhan virologists conspiring to spread the virus?


The comment you replied to says "covering it up to the extent they did" which would indeed be a theory about a conspiracy, yes.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: