That asks a question. I have no idea how much training neurologists have about psychogenic illnesses. All the study showed was the differences in the measurements, it does not mention any potential cause or really whether those differences explain the symptoms.
>So, even the physical evidence that has been detected you write off as the result of psychosomatic damage. These people are showing up with detectable brain injuries
First, psychosomatic illnesses can cause physical evidence. Besides that, something like three people had detectable injuries, the rest of the ~40 did not. There could be a very banal cause for that.
Again, the US government's own report says that that a psychogenic cause completely fits the available evidence. Suggesting that is the cause isn't trolling nor have I been duped into this position. Your complete denial of it makes no sense, I fully admit further evidence may show me to be wrong but you refuse to see it as a possibility.
That asks a question. I have no idea how much training neurologists have about psychogenic illnesses. All the study showed was the differences in the measurements, it does not mention any potential cause or really whether those differences explain the symptoms.
>So, even the physical evidence that has been detected you write off as the result of psychosomatic damage. These people are showing up with detectable brain injuries
First, psychosomatic illnesses can cause physical evidence. Besides that, something like three people had detectable injuries, the rest of the ~40 did not. There could be a very banal cause for that.
Again, the US government's own report says that that a psychogenic cause completely fits the available evidence. Suggesting that is the cause isn't trolling nor have I been duped into this position. Your complete denial of it makes no sense, I fully admit further evidence may show me to be wrong but you refuse to see it as a possibility.