Just because it's a Buddhist practice, and it's ancient, that's all you need...?
The same can be said about any other religious practice.
You sound almost like a Christian preacher who could very well say,
"Well, the 20 centuries of Christianity, and all those priests and laypeople. I'm not sure if you consider all that they've said and written to be evidence, but I think you should."
You need reasons actually grounded in preferably personal practice.
That is, something treated like a scientific experiment performed on yourself, to see if following the steps affects you. Then, you look at the results others have attained.
And then you draw rational and logical conclusions based off of that cumulative data.
Hmm, no, sorry if that's how it seemed. I mean the tens of thousands of books, talks, testimonials, etc, that make specific claims like attaining freedom from suffering using various specific strategies and meditation practices.
> You need reasons actually grounded in preferably personal practice.
My personal practice is a few thousand hours of meditation. It's obvious to me that the practice is working, but I can't say exactly what it's doing to my brain, and I can't prove it to anyone else (unless I would already appear odd on a brain scan)
Just because it's a Buddhist practice, and it's ancient, that's all you need...?
The same can be said about any other religious practice.
You sound almost like a Christian preacher who could very well say,
"Well, the 20 centuries of Christianity, and all those priests and laypeople. I'm not sure if you consider all that they've said and written to be evidence, but I think you should."
You need reasons actually grounded in preferably personal practice.
That is, something treated like a scientific experiment performed on yourself, to see if following the steps affects you. Then, you look at the results others have attained.
And then you draw rational and logical conclusions based off of that cumulative data.