Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The author lost me when they started the Christian bashing. The author lumped all Christians in with the organization cited in the original NYT article, which is just as prejudice as those for which they're claiming to defend (prostitutes).


I agree that lumping Christians in is a problem, as is ignoring secular influence in anti-sex lobbying groups.

How might you edit the article to remove the "Christian bashing" while also being clear about the influence of Christian conservatism on the topic?

How can we make a clear distinction while also being clear about the anti-sex ideologies that come directly from Christian conservatism?

Is there a specific secular influence that is worth pointing out here that the article missed or glossed over?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: