I am not a native English speaker, but I am not sure about that. Look at the word "track" -- pretty much no one would want to be tracked, right?
I guess if they replace "track" with "identify", more people would actually allow that. Something like "Allow this app to identify your device across apps and websites". Average users usually don't have problem being identified. They use the same email across websites, and will prefer facebook login on 3rd party websites if it is an option...
End of day, the thing getting blocked by the prompt is iOS IDFA, where letters "ID" mean "identifier".
But still, I don't mind Apply play a little wording game here. The ad industry, on the other side, did way uglier than Apple in the last decade.
I am a native speaker, and we are being far more than “identified” by these invasions. Why should Apple be using softer, less accurate, English to protect the likes of Facebook? This is not something to sugar coat, it is something to call out plainly.
I mean if your asking for ID, they Why is always there: to prove age, to track, etc. So, calling it "track" in their (Apple) messaging is good. Its the Identifier to Track You.
I am not a native English speaker, but I am not sure about that. Look at the word "track" -- pretty much no one would want to be tracked, right?
I guess if they replace "track" with "identify", more people would actually allow that. Something like "Allow this app to identify your device across apps and websites". Average users usually don't have problem being identified. They use the same email across websites, and will prefer facebook login on 3rd party websites if it is an option...
End of day, the thing getting blocked by the prompt is iOS IDFA, where letters "ID" mean "identifier".
But still, I don't mind Apply play a little wording game here. The ad industry, on the other side, did way uglier than Apple in the last decade.