Really, again? When I have an own opinion here that does not follow the mainstre...

nametoremember · on July 3, 2011

"Why is it so bad to have your sex duration published but its okay that your jogging performance visible to the world?"

They are completely different. Maybe not to you but if you can't see how it would bother some people then you're not thinking very hard.

frobozz · on July 4, 2011

They are completely different to me as well, which is why I don't record rumpy-pumpy on runkeeper, or wear my HRM/Cadence/GPS watch for it.

They are evidently not completely different to the users of fitbit who are telling the world about it, because otherwise they wouldn't be overtly and deliberately stating (on a website whose purpose is to share activity details with the world) that any particular 2m52s of increased activity was due to squelching.

Please let me know if I've missed some crucial point regarding fitbit usage, because I really can't see how this is "unwitting".

Hawramani · on July 3, 2011

The question is how the users feel about it. How the users should feel about it is irrelevant.

thehotdon · on July 3, 2011

Animals have very strict rules and regulations about the sacred act of rubbing genitals together.

yaix · on July 4, 2011

And humans have been endowed with brains to get around instinct controlled behavior that is not useful.