Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

1. Not necessarily: nobody said the time-travel couldn't pump energy at your destination to compensate for the energy the future is sending.

2. What does it have to do with the third law of thermodynamics (which is about the impossibility to reach a temperature of 0K)



I know next to nothing about all this so excuse my ignorance -and limited English-, but I've always thought that if you send, say, an apple (as in GP's comment) to the past... wouldn't that apple's atoms already exist there in the past -in the same apple if it already existed (you are sending it just some minutes back) or elsewhere like in the tree, the tree's soil... animals that later died and nourished the soil/tree... in rocks... wherever- and so you are duplicating them and hence creating energy/mass and breaking the law of conservation?

Either it's impossible to travel back in time in this universe or it is not an isolated system... or the law of conservation could somehow be broken... do my thoughts make any sense?


> pump energy at your destination

What does that even mean? This is the kind of hand-waving the OP was pointing out.

He probably meant the first law.


> What does that even mean

Any variation on this: “sending this item in the past, will grab the same amount of mass from the past, taken at random in a way that preserve the energy on both ends”


So like the gate of truth from Fullmetal Alchemist?


I think I messed up the number.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: