Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think maybe most ignorant person in the room would be a better description in most cases.

If you were the dumbest person in the room there would be little chance for you to close the gap. They would be light years ahead and pulling out, instead of you catching up.



Ignorant? Why not the 'least skilled person in the room'? I think that what the original post meant, no?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: