Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> When a new person joins a company, they have literally years and years worth of searchable content.

IF your company is paying to preserve it. At my not-very-tiny employer we only pay for something like 1 year of retention. I have no idea if that's a legal or financial decision, but either way it seems like a dumb one.



This is the exact reason we use Discord at my day job. Unlimited history for free. We still also get plenty of other integrations, webhooks, and bot-building for other automated things.


Many orgs would be concerned about Discord’s data mining of all chats, though.


User account retention you mean? This is why I try to shy away from work-related conversations in private messages (only casual chat) and encourage everything to happen in channels, which in turn are preserved.


Pretty sure that's a legal decision. The cheapest slack plan comes with unlimited backups from what I know.


Definitely legal. In Teams our messages are only retained for 90 days. You have to create a team for messages to be stored permanently. Similar for surveillance footage. Fortune 50


Just curious why this would be a legal decision? I can't think of any reason that keeping messages would be a bad thing.


If you are only required to keep data for one year and you keep it for 2 years, you can still be subpoenaed for that 2 year old data if you keep it. Thus, keeping data for longer than you are required is an increased business risk.


You’re doing something wrong and don’t want it to be subpoenaed?


I believe the way Slack works is that old messages are kept but hidden unless you pay. So someone could still subpoena the old messages.


Its more about messages taken out of context or a banter about a competitor between 2 random ICs getting highlighted in a big case.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: