It isn't just India. Recent developments suggest that the initial idea is dead for certain topics. Although it still works flawlessly for more technical articles, it certainly is a bad place to get information for anything that has become remotely politicized.
There are many detractors that either try to white wash articles or the other way around.
My last contribution to wikipedia is probably 10-15 years old. I also did some not so constructive stuff like supplying unfavorable information about politicians I didn't like. Remained untouched by any editors until my guilty conscience removed it again.
Currently I feel that certain article inform me more about the inclinations of certain cliques of editors instead of the topic, exactly how it is described in the article.
The supposed fight against bias has introduced more of it. A lot of it.
that's an eye-opener article. include some proofs, references, etc to make it more solid. else, this would be seen as a merely very-long-allegation piece
There are many detractors that either try to white wash articles or the other way around.
My last contribution to wikipedia is probably 10-15 years old. I also did some not so constructive stuff like supplying unfavorable information about politicians I didn't like. Remained untouched by any editors until my guilty conscience removed it again.
Currently I feel that certain article inform me more about the inclinations of certain cliques of editors instead of the topic, exactly how it is described in the article.
The supposed fight against bias has introduced more of it. A lot of it.