Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> But at the very beginning, there is no reason to believe she is different than any other judge who would be assigned in her stead, and the schedule would barely be affected.

The judge that would be assigned in her stead is different in that they will operate with the knowledge that their predecessor had their family murdered, quite possibly because of the case they're now handling. How is that not obvious?



OK let's follow this train of thought, what message is conveyed here? Don't touch this case? Side with investors? Side with the bank?

Even if you're right and fear is the motivation, fear in which direction?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: