The accusation [1] is public. I will translate the highlight parts of the conversation transcription between the hacker and Gleen Greenwald.
In another thread I discussed how they hacked the Telegram accounts.
Page 58:
> MOLIÇÃO: Like it happened with Danilo Gentilli, the MBL and Holiday. We got [their Telegram account] last october. They only started talking [on the news] about this [Telegram hacking] now.
Some context:
Danilo Gentilli is a liberal tv show host that was very vocal on the last election;
MBL is acronym to "Free Brazil Movement";
Holiday is a politician with MBL affiliation.
In Brazil, the liberals are the right-wings. Their motto is "Liberal on the economy and conservative on the customs", custom as traditional practice.
On page 58:
> GG: Because, for instance,
if they knew that someone is getting ready to publish [the hacked conversations],
or worst,
that we [The InterceptBR] are ready to publish,
they would
get an judicial order
to forbid
the publication or reporting of this material.
But so far, no one have done that.
Therefore, it look like
they don't know who has "this material".
> GG: They know someone have this, but they don't know who has it.
> M: Yes. We also want to know your opinion about something...
Once you publish the articles,
everyone will exclude their conversations,
everyone will exclude their Telegram.
We want to know what do you suggest us should to do.
We have some names separated,
we can get [their conversation from Telegram] this weekend
or leave it for a while. [I ask this]because, there are some people
that already changed their number, we can't get their conversations anymore.
Page 60.
> GG [black text included]: Yes. Look, we are going to [??], what is going to happen? They are going for sure try to accuse us in participating in the hacking. They are going to accuse that us of being part on the hacking attempt.
For sure, they are going to accuse us. So, I'll keep the messages for myself, the messages are the proof that you only talked to us after you already done everything. This is very important for us as journalist to show that our source only talked after they already had everything.
Page 61.
> GG [only text in red]: We already saved everything, we received everything. I think you had any reason to keep any of this, understood?
In the bold text, Molicao asks if they should hack more people, he wanted to know GG opnion.
Page 62.
> GG: Yes, yes. This is difficult because I can't give you advice but I've the obligation to protect my source and this obligation is a very serious obligation, very serious. We are going to do everything we can to do this, understood?
> GG [only red text]: Also, we are going to say we received everything before those articles from the other week about Moro [begin hacked], about the other hacking.
In another thread I discussed how they hacked the Telegram accounts.
Page 58:
> MOLIÇÃO: Like it happened with Danilo Gentilli, the MBL and Holiday. We got [their Telegram account] last october. They only started talking [on the news] about this [Telegram hacking] now.
Some context:
Danilo Gentilli is a liberal tv show host that was very vocal on the last election; MBL is acronym to "Free Brazil Movement"; Holiday is a politician with MBL affiliation.
In Brazil, the liberals are the right-wings. Their motto is "Liberal on the economy and conservative on the customs", custom as traditional practice.
On page 58:
> GG: Because, for instance, if they knew that someone is getting ready to publish [the hacked conversations], or worst, that we [The InterceptBR] are ready to publish, they would get an judicial order to forbid the publication or reporting of this material. But so far, no one have done that. Therefore, it look like they don't know who has "this material".
> GG: They know someone have this, but they don't know who has it.
> M: Yes. We also want to know your opinion about something... Once you publish the articles, everyone will exclude their conversations, everyone will exclude their Telegram. We want to know what do you suggest us should to do. We have some names separated, we can get [their conversation from Telegram] this weekend or leave it for a while. [I ask this]because, there are some people that already changed their number, we can't get their conversations anymore.
Page 60.
> GG [black text included]: Yes. Look, we are going to [??], what is going to happen? They are going for sure try to accuse us in participating in the hacking. They are going to accuse that us of being part on the hacking attempt. For sure, they are going to accuse us. So, I'll keep the messages for myself, the messages are the proof that you only talked to us after you already done everything. This is very important for us as journalist to show that our source only talked after they already had everything.
Page 61.
> GG [only text in red]: We already saved everything, we received everything. I think you had any reason to keep any of this, understood?
In the bold text, Molicao asks if they should hack more people, he wanted to know GG opnion.
Page 62.
> GG: Yes, yes. This is difficult because I can't give you advice but I've the obligation to protect my source and this obligation is a very serious obligation, very serious. We are going to do everything we can to do this, understood?
> GG [only red text]: Also, we are going to say we received everything before those articles from the other week about Moro [begin hacked], about the other hacking.
[1] https://politica.estadao.com.br/blogs/fausto-macedo/wp-conte...