> Do these articles assume that engineers are incapable of thinking flexibly and need to follow some absolute truths that have to be debated?
I think this article assumes that there are possibly engineers that don't think flexibly and need to follow some "absolute truths".
> Have I been around too good engineers that I have not noticed this issue?
Probably. I mean, I would love to be between your colleagues.
In some places, submission to ideas rumored to be proven is valued more than flexible thinking, critical thinking at any time, etc. I know that some countries in Asian have a rather high degree of culture like this. It doesn't apply to everyone.
I think this article assumes that there are possibly engineers that don't think flexibly and need to follow some "absolute truths".
> Have I been around too good engineers that I have not noticed this issue?
Probably. I mean, I would love to be between your colleagues.
In some places, submission to ideas rumored to be proven is valued more than flexible thinking, critical thinking at any time, etc. I know that some countries in Asian have a rather high degree of culture like this. It doesn't apply to everyone.