Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Neither does Google. They prioritise AMP pages over regular pages, regardless of what the regular page looks like.

EDIT: @afiori comments below that this may no longer be the case.



What does that have to do with respect for receiving device or connection speed?


If the respect was for the receiving device or connection speed, the metric used to determine priority of results would be size of payload / speed of delivery, rather than if the technology / hosting was google-owned.


As far as I recall they fixed that, now the problem is that they the measure for speed they use does some weird tricks around partial loads; as long as you display _something_ soon they are happy and the fact that a page might be useless for many seconds is weighted less


That matches with human psychology of perception, IIUC.


Yes, I understand why they would want to do it. But it also mean that I am staring at a unusable page...


But the alternative is you'd be staring at a useragent-provided crawler for N seconds to get to a usable page, right?




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: