Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I’ve wondered if YouTube could actually build more cheaply using AWS than Google. I don’t think I’ll ever know the answer as it involves super private cost data from Amazon, Google, and Netflix.

Traffic stats show YouTube and Netflix [0] pretty close so people are obviously delivering video for profit.

[0] https://images.app.goo.gl/AVFevudgSTHhxfM99



Netflix does not deliver video from AWS, though. They use it to encode and run other infra, but for streaming they use NAS/streaming FreeBSD boxes co-located in ISP datacenters. If they streamed from AWS, Netflix would be out of business already.


That’s a good point as the bulk of that transfer isn’t coming from AWS, probably.

This still means YouTube doesn’t need google’s infrastructure to stream video.


It does mean a drastically different cost structure, and major difficulties in operating worldwide.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: