> I think one of the biggest problems with Agile is that everybody thinks it's okay to operate without a specification of what is to be built.
Backlog items in most processes called agile are specs, and most variations include an activity of assuring that they meet whatever quality standards are in place prior to being eligible for development.
It's more common for places claiming to be agile to not have any integrated spec for what has been built than to not have specs of each to-be-built unit, AFAICT.
Backlog items in most processes called agile are specs, and most variations include an activity of assuring that they meet whatever quality standards are in place prior to being eligible for development.
It's more common for places claiming to be agile to not have any integrated spec for what has been built than to not have specs of each to-be-built unit, AFAICT.