> Strikes an equitable balance between reliability and respect for the user.
Is it just me, or is that a novel interpretation of "respect for the user"?
"I'm going to continue to track you even after the usual and expected method of preventing tracking in the browser is used, but if you jump through an unexpected hoop that's not documented to the user, then I'll grudgingly delete my tracking data..."
It depends on how the data is used and if an easy delete option exists. There is a valid use case for working around browser behaviour not user behaviour:
> browsers will unceremoniously delete IndexedDB, LocalStorage, and/or SessionStorage without warning under storage pressure
If you have an app that stores a small amount of data client-side (preferences, data to allow operation while unable to connect) but is not used very often it's stored state could be evicted because of a few large apps because the browser drops data on a "last used" basis because it has no way of knowing that this bit of data might be more important than the data touched more recently. The user might not want a small amount of practical data for an app that they used on their morning commute being evicted because they've touched some large games over the weekend. For a large device this isn't going to be an issue as you are unlikely to be that limited for space, but for a cheap phone with limited storage it could be a real inconvenience.
Any app doing this should have a very easy and obvious "purge my data from this device" option, to maintain the user control. In fact to do it properly right, the local storage should be opt-in ("Do you want to keep some data locally to speed up this app and allow it to be used offline? Yes / Not now / No and don't bother be again") with the app continuing to function without the local data cache.
> I'm going to continue to track you even after
Of course it will get used for this, it would be naive to think otherwise, it is after all essentially a structured evercookie, but that doesn't stop the idea having good uses too. The existence of arsonists doesn't mean you need to ban all uses of fire.
Is it just me, or is that a novel interpretation of "respect for the user"?
"I'm going to continue to track you even after the usual and expected method of preventing tracking in the browser is used, but if you jump through an unexpected hoop that's not documented to the user, then I'll grudgingly delete my tracking data..."