That seems counter to the narrative that led to the current holder of the highest office in the United States, no? Because if his fans believe in unquestioningly science then why do they disbelieve in a tapas selection of the following: climate change, evolution, vaccines, gravity, a round Earth, and/or whether the moon landing happened?
One very good argument I've read recently is that most of what pro-science people label as "anti-scientific" statements like anti-vax stuff are made by people that don't refuse science as a whole but just science coming from what they perceive is a corrupted establishment. Clearly this involve cherry-picking that validates their ideological positions, or it's just following the twisted narrative of some political group.
Science, with the capital S, is still society's reference framework for truth (and this is a huge problem, but not the one we are talking about) but these people refute the priests and the religion, not the God. New priests are bending the same God to their interests and the times favor them over the previous priests.
