Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>Russia actually got inside the voting systems of seven states, including 4 of the 5 largest states in terms of electoral votes—California (55) Texas (38) Florida (29) and Illinois (20).

And yet two of those states listed went for Hillary. Maybe the Russians didn't want to be obvious.

Author spends a lot of time on Georgia, with its "D" rated voting system and its 16 electoral votes.

>Georgia’s systems would have been an “ideal” target for Russian hackers because the state doesn’t use a system with a paper trail so there is no way to audit the system.

Let's accept that for the sake of my next question - would a paper trail actually help? Maybe, depending on who gets the paper. Does it mean the voter gets a receipt? That might cause a few problems of its own.

For instance, a group of well-armed people acting as a "voting integrity militia" might decide to inspect people's voting receipts for any "errors." One can only imagine how the article's writer would characterize that.

Now let's pretend some of all of the states admit their systems had been compromised. Should we trust the results of any election, or just the results we don't like? We can reasonably guess the author's answer to that question.



> Maybe the Russians didn't want to be obvious.

If California voted for Trump, that would in fact be obvious...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: