Parent puts A and B on the same point of his value™ scale (his scale, his choice)[0].
But you put A on top of your scale and B a little lower (your scale, your choice).
But now you are saying that since parent equals A and B it means parent equals his A to your lower B ? That's where your argument is weak. It's your scale, not parent's.
[0] I assume it's near the top but the demonstration works the same if it's on the bottom.
How do you know I am "he"? But anyway, I neither raised chickens to the level of humans nor thought I was doing so.
And my "actions"? What actions? I literally don't know what you are saying. I didn't take any actions or describe any.
The pure quantity of lives built here is negative. I wasn't making a judgment about the quality or significance of the lives. If there has to be a conflict (I don't think that's inevitable), I support the human lives over chicken ones. I'm just not so dense that I completely disregard the notion of chicken lives (as the headline does, not that the business is doing that).
Parent puts A and B on the same point of his value™ scale (his scale, his choice)[0].
But you put A on top of your scale and B a little lower (your scale, your choice).
But now you are saying that since parent equals A and B it means parent equals his A to your lower B ? That's where your argument is weak. It's your scale, not parent's.
[0] I assume it's near the top but the demonstration works the same if it's on the bottom.