Not to rain on your parade, but it would still be very wise to have contingency plans around dying after age 30 (will, insurance) and to assume otherwise you'll die around 75-80.
The article is much less optimist than you seem to be interpreting it. It's basically "is there a hard cap on the age you'll die, or is it just random and independent of age past a certain point".
It says nothing about the aging process. Being older than 90 still sucks for the most part, and this article says nothing about quality of life.
It also is a very minor point, in a practical sense: is it impossible to live past 120, or is it possible with then odds of 1:10^9?
The article is much less optimist than you seem to be interpreting it. It's basically "is there a hard cap on the age you'll die, or is it just random and independent of age past a certain point".
It says nothing about the aging process. Being older than 90 still sucks for the most part, and this article says nothing about quality of life.
It also is a very minor point, in a practical sense: is it impossible to live past 120, or is it possible with then odds of 1:10^9?