Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why is there no baseline mentioned here? This is something that really bothers me about reporting these days. How much is 25 times? Is that a lot? I have no way of knowing. What kind of rate does that imply? How much should I discount police testimony given that information? If it's 25 out of 100, that's really bad. If it's 25 out of 100,000 - maybe it's not that pervasive a problem.


That does raise an interesting question:

How many innocents convicted, due to institutionalized, consequence-free perjury, is too many?

If you think 25 out of 100,000 isn't "that pervasive a problem", thank your lucky stars you're not one of those 25.


In a perfect world, sure. But in the actual world that we live in, reducing false convictions to zero is not realistic. So we have to look for areas where investing our resources in fixing a problem will have a comparatively large beneficial impact. If it's 25/100, there's a lot to be gained there. If it's 25/100,000, there isn't.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: