Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not sure why "pair programming" is the go-to tool here. It certainly implies something different to a lot of people, myself included.

Pair programming is not a "social" outlet. It's collaborative, but "social?" That's quite a stretch of the word from where I think James used it.



Like I said, I am not seeking agreement on the merit of his idea.

You specifically said that the suggestion of Pair Programming, was due to James thinking that women are "less capable of individual action".

But you also said "It's a technique to improve product reliability and give more practical mentorship opportunities." Which is also my understanding. I know at least one shop where everybody pair programs. It has nothing to do with programmers being inferior. I also agree that paring is more sociable since every day I will have to greet my team mate, talk about stuff, have a coffee, then get to work.

I'm just trying to understand how "Pair Programming" changes meaning so much just because some dude wrote a manifesto. We can't even have a discussion if our understanding of the same document is so wildly different.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: