Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

IIRC, NTFS was over-designed/future-proofed and Windows actually only supports a fraction of it's functionality.


I'd really like to know what is so unHN-like about my post. Maybe my information is wrong and/or outdated, but I was just presenting the information that I had, hoping it would further discussion and/or be useful to someone.


Could you provide some sources?


Sorry, just something I remember reading in a forum post a while ago. I think that forum may have been Slashdot. The gist of it being that the original specs made room for a lot of features that Windows didn't support at the time, and Windows has slowly been adding them as time moves along (i.e. hardlinks, symlinks, etc).

The closest I can come on Wikipedia is:

  > It is also clear that NTFS owes some of its
  > architectural design to Files-11 used by VMS.
  > This is hardly surprising since Dave Cutler was
  > the main lead for both VMS and Windows NT.


NTFS, for instance, always supported symbolic links. Only with Windows Vista a command for that was provided.


I am unsure if the whole of it was implemented or only specified.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: