Sorry, but you are wrong. Khosla could have maintained the property in the old state where he charged admission and made no changes to the property. He was warned about this when he bought the property. California law is extremely clear about this, and a cursor check of case law would have confirmed this. Khosla knowingly violated the law in an attempt to remove public access using thin and unlikely legal excuses involving pre-US law. He had his day in court and lost. He has received a court order and continues to be defiant.

This isn't the "property rights" hill you want to die on. This is an utter jerk being an utter jerk. This is a rich man trying to use money as a substitute for following clear Law.

This is such extreme lawless behavior that every time that every time I see a company take investment from Khosla it stains that company in my mind forever.