I don't disagree with the the underlying points, but I do think it's hard to take a full stock of something like this. Workplaces as places where people work is a fairly big piece of culture to just change.
It's clearly true that work can be done elsewhere, but that doesn't mean workplaces are something we can just abandon and leave everything else the same. Imagine if a parliament decided they didn't need to see each-other in person. The whole system would be different.
This doesn't mean you shouldn't get a remote job. Maybe whole companies should be built this way from the ground up. Companies are cultures of a sort, with their fair share of cultural pathologies. Being in physical proximity is one of the ways companies function culturally, at present. All these things will need to be resolved some other (probably cultural) way for companies to function remotely.
It's clearly true that work can be done elsewhere, but that doesn't mean workplaces are something we can just abandon and leave everything else the same. Imagine if a parliament decided they didn't need to see each-other in person. The whole system would be different.
This doesn't mean you shouldn't get a remote job. Maybe whole companies should be built this way from the ground up. Companies are cultures of a sort, with their fair share of cultural pathologies. Being in physical proximity is one of the ways companies function culturally, at present. All these things will need to be resolved some other (probably cultural) way for companies to function remotely.