Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"I was comparing "now" with medieval era..."

In that case you should compare properly:

English kept their children at home "till the age of seven or nine at the utmost" but then "put them out, both males and females, to hard service in the houses of other people, binding them generally for another seven or nine years"... most parents waved goodbye to them at about 14... Illiterate servants had no means of communicating with their parents, and the difficulties of travel meant that even if children were only sent 20 miles (32 km) away they could feel completely isolated... adolescents were a useful source of cheap labour for their masters. In 1350, the Black Death had reduced Europe's population by roughly half, so hired labour was expensive.[1]

Doesn't sound too awesome to me.

"In many countries, there are large amounts of fatherless children, for example black children in US was about 73% of them being fatherless."

And in Iceland over 70% of children are born to single parents[2]. I'm not sure what your point is - this isn't necessarily bad unless you are making a value judgement here?

[1] http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26289459

[2] https://www.fatherly.com/parenting-and-relationships/why-ice...



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: