Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It seems like a fairly common case for a Rust function to encounter multiple types of error when it runs. My only solution to this is to return a custom error type, but this means manually matching rather than using something like try! or ?.

Can someone with more experience than I tell me if there is a simpler approach?



Yes, there is a simpler approach.

If your function returns Result<T, Box<Error>>, then you can use try! or ? operator to return any kind of error. It will be automatically boxed and converted into the generic Box<Error>.

This works for two reasons:

1) try! and ? don't simply return Err(err) on error case as one might think. They actually return Err(From::from(err)).

2) The standard library has: impl<'a, E: Error + 'a> From<E> for Box<Error + 'a> { ... }

Check out this article, starting from "The From trait": http://blog.burntsushi.net/rust-error-handling/


Another solution I hadn't considered is to simply impl std::convert::From<SomeError> for your custom error type for each SomeError that might be encountered.


Awesome, thanks. Does returning boxed errors have a performance impact?


It should only have an impact when errors actually occur, i think.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: